By: Emlyn Koster
An Earth scientist with 32 years at the helm of four large nature and science museums and with publications and presentations continuing to delve into what leadership of external relevance entails, Emlyn reflects on the potentially greater value of museums in a world beset by crises.
The period since early 2019 has been an unprecedented slog of stressful uncertainty for every type of organization. Yet with the museum concept inspired by The Muses―the goddesses of the arts and sciences in Greek mythology—museums should, in particular I believe, be striving to use long and wide lenses to shape their most valuable responses to today’s circumstances.
During the pandemic, understandably, online exchanges among museums have been much more about pressing operational matters than big-picture strategic matters. Also, published leadership-level musings have been rare. Each a commendable sharing of reflective thoughts, these include the perspectives of directors at a cultural anthropology museum, art and nature museum, a group of middle managers at four natural history and marine science museums, and two former science museum directors (see David Chesebrough and Robert Mac West, 2021, The new world: and how science museums need to evolve to meet societies’ needs, Informal Learning Review, May/June, 21-27).
Before this decade, an ‘existential crisis’ described individuals consumed with anxiety about how they see themselves and their purpose. Announced as new vocabulary by Dictionary.com, it began to also be a whole society term as climate change, the Covid-19 pandemic, and structural racism dominated the news.
Introduced in the 1960s, the term ‘wicked problem’ has long struck me as a jarring label because wicked refers to a morally wrong stance. However, it seems apt for the situation of the Covid-19 pandemic and its variants because they have harmed our diverse society so deeply and inequitably. John Camillus of the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Business stated that wicked problems “can’t be solved, but [they] can be tamed” and that “solutions to wicked problems are not true or false, but good or bad”. Pathways to better times, he concluded, lie with continuous scanning of pertinent circumstances with assumption monitoring and adaptive decision-making.
A Long Lens
I have been surprised by the scarcity of references to motivational outlooks of the museum sector during the Great Depression, World Wars I and II, and after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Here are several examples. Presentations at the 1942 AAM Annual Meeting stated: “With every crisis, there comes a spiritual awakening, and also an intellectual advancement… Our institutions are not merely guardians of the past, but are factors in the building and molding of character for the future” (L. Hubbard Shattuck, 1942, Wartime duties of historical museums, Museum News, October 1, 6-8) and “The very subject of our discussion shows the painful anxiety and uncertainty with which we search for our proper function in the national struggle for a better future” (A.E. Parr, 1942, The Wartime duties of natural history museums, Museum News, September 1, 6-8). In a cautionary note, “When the funds began to flow again, museums quickly forgot the shock of the Depression as well as their moments of innovation on behalf of the public… An opportunity to be societal role models for the wisest use of resources and talent was lost” (Marjorie Schwarzer, 2009, Bringing it to the people: lessons from the first Great Depression, Museum, May-June, 49-54). Recalling an initiative by The Families of September 11 and Liberty Science Center: “Our careers and backgrounds are so dissimilar that we could barely imagine how our professional lives could ever intersect: a mental health professional specializing in trauma and a president of a science center… We committed to a vision for the future based on what we learned”.
A Wide Lens
Also, I often lean on recommendations about organizational leadership that have passed the test of time. Here are several favorites. Aristotle (384-322 BC) viewed leadership as the harmonious pursuit of positive consequences in the world: significant, I think, because of his emphasis on linked internal and external dynamics. John Cotton Dana (1856-1929) advocated that museums align their activities with the needs of their communities: significant, I think, because he prioritized needs above wants. Stephen Covey (1932-2012) echoed Peter Drucker (1909-2005) in stressing the distinction between effectiveness and efficiency: respectively doing the right things and doing things right which they emphasized are the main responsibilities of leadership and management. John Kotter (1947- ), Emeritus Professor of Leadership at the Harvard Business School, listed these steps for a successful renewal:
- Establish a sense of urgency
- Form a powerful guiding coalition
- Create a vision
- Communicate the vision
- Empower others to act on the vision
- Plan for and create short-term wins
- Consolidate improvements and produce still more change
- Institutionalize new approaches
Because vision is a central thread, I also wish to cite a first page statement in a 1992 book titled ‘Visionary Leadership’: “There is no more powerful engine driving an organization toward excellence and long-range success than an attractive, worthwhile, and achievable vision of the future, widely shared”. A contrary view, which I also applaud because it encourages the weighing of options, has recently been advanced by a university art museum director.
A fair question in today’s chaotic world surrounds what is achievable? A quarter century ago, the 150th anniversary symposium of The Smithsonian Institution heard this admonition: “The mission statement of most museums which often states “Our mission is to collect, preserve and interpret fill-in-the-blank will no longer do. Such statements do not answer the vital question of ‘So what?’””. Arguably more than ever, museums need to specify their ‘so what?’ intentions in past-present-future contexts. This behooves museums to have less lofty missions with realistic content (exhibitions/programs/conversations) and audience (onsite/offsite/online) goals. In my view, this adaptive step becomes part of what continues to be a robust approach to strategic planning―namely, the following sequential, but needing to be frequently revisited, steps to distinctively define an organization and attract friends and funds to it:
- Values: Enduring attitudinal traits, typically 5-7, that define the organization’s core culture and that must not be violated by any transaction or decision (in a new organization these are a mix of early realities and credible aspirations).
- Stakeholders: Those with vested interests in the well-being of the organization, both those who can affect and be affected by its performance, most notably its core audience(s).
- Mission: Jargon-free, memorable, often one-sentence statement of the organization’s purpose / ‘so what?’ / raison d’être / beating heart in relation to external needs (a marketing tagline / slogan is a potential addition).
- Vision: Forward-looking, inspiring, one or two paragraph statement of a more advanced stage of the organization’s impacts.
- Strategy: High-level roadmap of the organization’s intentions as a guide to how value-conforming efforts will best advance the mission in the direction of the vision (there is definitional variation between several interrelated terms, including strategies, goals, key result areas, and objectives).
“Greatness is Not a Function of Circumstance”
Facing wicked problems requires bold and innovative leadership with a preparedness to revisit strategic plans for timely adjustments. In his manifesto for the social sector, Jim Collins (1958- ) concluded: “Greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness, it turns out, is largely a matter of conscious choice, and discipline”.
About the Author
Emlyn Koster, PhD was the CEO at Canada’s Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleontology and Ontario Science Centre between 1986-96 and at NJ’s Liberty Science Center and the NC Museum of Natural Sciences between 1996-2018. Concurrently, he had advisory roles at the Getty and Noyce Leadership Institutes and attended ‘Strategic Perspectives for Nonprofit Management’ at the Harvard Business School. An ambassador for the International Coalition for Sites of Conscience and an adjunct professor at NC State University, he writes, speaks and advises on the Anthropocene which is transdisciplinary shorthand for human disruption of the Earth System. You can read his previous blog posts here.